Archive for January, 2012

XenServer 6.0 with DRBD

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

DRBD is a low-cost shared-SAN-like solution, which has several great benefits, among which are no single point of failure, and very low cost (local storage and network cable). Its main disadvantages are in the need to constantly monitor it, and make sure it does what’s expected. Also – in some cases – performance might be affected greatly.

If you need XenServer pool with VMs XenMotion (used to call it LiveMigration. I liked it better then…), but you cannot afford or do not want classic shared storage acting a single point of failure, DRBD could be for you. You have to understand the limitations, however.

The most important limitation is with data consistency. If you aim at using it as Active/Active, as I have, you need to make sure that under any circumstance you will not have split brain, as it will mean losing data (you will recover to an older point in time). If you aim at Active/Passive, or all your VMs will run on a single host, then the danger is lower, however – for A/A, and VMs spread across both hosts – the danger is imminent, and you should be aware of it.

This does not mean that you will have to run crying in case of split brain. It means you might be required to export/import VMs to maintain consistent data, and that you will have a very long downtime. Kinda defies the purpose of XenMotion and all…

Using the DRBD guid here, you will find an excellent solution, but not a complete one. I will describe my additions to this document.

So, first, you need to download the DRBD packages. I have re-packaged them, as they did not match XenServer with XS60E003 update. You can grub this particular tar.gz here: drbd-8.3.12-xenserver6.0-xs003.tar.gz . I did not use DRBD 8.4.1, as it has shown great instability and liked getting split-brained all the time. Don’t want it with our system, do we?

Make sure you have defined the private link between your hosts, both as a network interface, as described, and in both servers’ /etc/hosts file. It will be easier later. Verify that the host hostname matches the configuration file, else DRBD will not start.

Next, follow the mentioned guide.

Unlike this guide, I did not define DRBD to be Active/Active in the configuration file. I have noticed that upon reboot of the pool master (and always it), probably due to timing issues, as the XE Toolstack did not release the DRBD device, it would have started in split-brain mode, and I was incapable of handling it correctly. No matter when I have tried to set the service to start, as early as possible, it would have always start in split-brain mode.

The workaround was to let it start in passive mode, and while being read-only device, XE Toolstack cannot use it. Then I wait (in /etc/rc.local) for it to complete sync, and connect the PBD.

You will need each host PBD for this specific SR.

You can do it by running:

for i in `xe host-list --minimal` ; do 
echo -n "host `xe host-param-get param-name=hostname uuid=$i`  "
echo "PBD `xe pbd-list sr-uuid=$(xe  sr-list name-label=drbd-sr1 --minimal) --minimal`"
done

This will result in a line per host with the DRBD PBD uuid. Replace drbd-sr1 with your actual DRBD SR name.

You will require this info later.

My drbd.conf file looks like this:

# You can find an example in  /usr/share/doc/drbd.../drbd.conf.example

#include "drbd.d/global_common.conf";
#include "drbd.d/*.res";

resource drbd-sr1 {
protocol C;
startup {
degr-wfc-timeout 120; # 2 minutes.
outdated-wfc-timeout 2; # 2 seconds.
#become-primary-on both;
}

handlers {
    split-brain "/usr/lib/drbd/notify.sh root";
}

disk {
max-bio-bvecs 1;
no-md-flushes;
no-disk-flushes;
no-disk-barrier;
}

net {
allow-two-primaries;
cram-hmac-alg "sha1";
shared-secret "Secr3T";
after-sb-0pri discard-zero-changes;
after-sb-1pri discard-secondary;
after-sb-1pri consensus;
after-sb-2pri disconnect;
#after-sb-2pri call-pri-lost-after-sb;
max-buffers 8192;
max-epoch-size 8192;
sndbuf-size 1024k;
}

syncer {
rate 1G;
al-extents 2099;
}

on xenserver1 {
device /dev/drbd1;
disk /dev/sda3;
address 10.1.1.1:7789;
meta-disk internal;
}
on xenserver2 {
device /dev/drbd1;
disk /dev/sda3;
address 10.1.1.2:7789;
meta-disk internal;
}
}

I did not force them both to become primary, as split-brain handling in A/A mode is very complex. I have forced them to start as secondary.
Then, in /etc/rc.local, I have added the following lines:

echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
while grep sync /proc/drbd > /dev/null 2>&1
do
        sleep 5
done
/sbin/drbdadm primary all
/opt/xensource/bin/xe pbd-plug uuid=dfb02709-2483-a11a-cb0e-eac0fb05d8e2

This performs the following:

  • Add an additional core to Domain 0, to reduce chances of CPU overload with DRBD
  • Waits for any sync to complete (if DRBD failed, it will continue, but you will have a split brain, or no DRBD at all)
  • Brings the DRBD device to primary mode. I have had only one DRBD device, but this can be performed selectively for each device
  • Reconnects the PBD which, till this point in the boot sequence, was disconnected. An important note – replace the uuid with the one discovered above for each host – each host should unplug its own PBD.

To sum it up – until sync has been completed, the PBD will not be plugged, and until then, no VMs can run on this SR. Split brain handling for A/P configuration is so much easier.

Some additional notes:

  • I have failed horribly when the interconnect cable was down. I did not implement hardware fencing mechanisms, but it would probably be a very good practice for production systems. Disconnecting the cross cable will result in a split brain.
  • For this system to be worthy, it has to have external monitoring. DRBD must be monitored at all times.
  • Practice and document cases of single node failure, both nodes failure, host master failure, etc. Make sure you know how to react before it happens in real-life.
  • Performance was measured on a Linux RHEL6 VM to be about 82MB/s. The hardware it was tested on was Dell PE R610 with a very nice RAID5 array, etc. When the 2nd host was down, performance resulted in abour 450MB/s, so the bandwidth, in this particular case, matters.
  • Performance test was done using the command:
    dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M of=/tmp/test_file.dd oflag=direct
    Without the oflag=direct, the system will overload the disk write cache of the OS, and not the disk itself (at least – not immediately).
  • I did not test random-access performance.
Hope it helps