I was required to auto map a USB DoK to a KVM VM (specific VM, mind you!), as a result of connecting this device to the host. I’ve looked it up on the Internet, and the closest I could get there was this link. It was almost a complete solution, but it had a few bugs, so I will re-describe the whole process, with the fixes I’ve added to the process and udev rules file. While this guide is rather old, it did solve my requirement, which was to map a specific set of devices (“known USB devices”) to the VM, and not any and every USB device (or even – USB DoK) connected to the system.
In my example, I’ve used SanDisk Corp. Ultra Fit, which its USB identifier is 0781:5583, as can be seen using ‘lsusb’ command:
[root@localhost ~]# lsusb
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
Bus 001 Device 020: ID 0781:5583 SanDisk Corp. Ultra Fit
My VM is called “centos7.0” in this example. I am using integrated KVM+QEMU+LIBVIRT on a generic CentOS 7.5 system.
Preparation
You will need to prepare two files:
USB definitions file (for easier config of libvirt)
UDEV rules file (which will be triggered by add/remove operation, and will call the USB definitions file)
USB Definitions file
I’ve placed it in /opt/autousb/hostdev-0781:5583.xml , and it holds the following (mind the USB device identifiers!)
I’ve created a file /etc/udev/rules.d/90-libvirt-usb.rules with the content below. Note that the device identifiers are there, but in the “remove” section they appear differently. Remove leading zero(s) and change the string. This is caused because on removal, the device does not report all its properties to the OS. Also – you cannot connect more than three (3) such devices to a VM, so when you fail to detach three devices (following a consecutive insert/remove operations, for example), you will not be able to attach a fourth time.
First and foremost, although I’ve purchased a new display card, I haven’t installed it in the computer yet, as my NVidia has decided to behave. Maybe it’s something to do with some specific build of Firefox, as it’s the only main package changed during the last two or three days. Second, I’ve tape-recorded into my…
The concept of running a virtual machine, KVM-based, in this case, under RHCS is acceptable and reasonable. The interesting part is that the <vm/> directive replaces the <service/> directive and acts as a high-level directive for VMs. This allows for things which cannot be performed with regular ‘service’, such as live migration. There are probably…
I have had a stressed time, and had no time to actually write down anything here. This is pity, since I have been doing so many things worth sharing. I will start with a small one now – how to convert a physical machine into Xen-based VM. I assume you know the drill of how…
As my work takes me to various places (where technology is concerned), I collect lots of browser tab of things I want to keep for later reference. I have to admit, sadly, that I lack the time to sort them out, to make a real good and nice post about them. I do not want…
Here’s a little issue. If you were to replicate MS Exchange DB from one machine to another, how/what would you have done? The scenario goes as follows: You have your own domain, and you use, for your own core services AD and MS Exchange for the whole organization. While AD supports some built-in replication, so…
I have always liked IBM DS series management suite. I have claimed once that your first storage (and with it – your way of thinking about storage abstraction, I assume) is your favorite storage. I have been using the Storage Manager 9 for years now, even before it was 9 (I think that it was…
One Comment