VMware Fencing in RedHat Cluster 5 (RHCS5)

Cluster fencing – Unlike many common thoughts, high-availability is not the highest priority of an high-availability cluster, but only the 2nd one. The highest priority of an high-availability cluster is maintenance of data integrity by prevention of multiple concurrent access of nodes to the shared disk.

On different cluster, depending on the vendor, this can be achieved by different methods, either by prevention of access based on the status of the cluster (for example – Microsoft Cluster, which will not allow access to the disks without cluster management and coordination), by panicking the node in question (Oracle RAC, for example, or IBM HACMP), or by preventing failover unless the status of the other node, as well as all heartbeat links were ok up to the exact moment of failure (VCS, for example).

Another method is based on a fence, or “Shoot the Other Node in the Head”. This “fence” is usually based on an hardware device which has no dependencies for the node’s OS, and is capable of shutting it down, many times brutally, upon request. A good fencing device can be a UPS, which supports the other node. The whole idea is that in a case of uncertainty, either one of the nodes can attempt to ‘kill’ the other node, independently of any connectivity issue one of them might experience. This race result is quite obvious: one node remains alive, capable of taking over the resource groups, the other node is off, unable to access the disk in an uncontrolled manner.

Linux-based clusters will not force you to use fencing of any sort, however, for a production environments, setups without any fencing device will be unsupported, as the cluster cannot handle cases of split-brain or uncertainty. These hardware devices, which can be, as said before, a manageable UPS, a remote-control power-switch, the server’s own IPMI (or any other independent system such as HP ILO, IBM HMC, etc), and even the fiber switch – as long as it can prevent the node in question from accessing the disks, are quite expensive, but comparing to hours of restore-from-backup, they sure justify their price.

On many sites there is a demand for a “test” setup which will be as similar to the production setup as possible. This test setup can be used to test upgrades, configuration changes, etc. Using fencing in this environment is important, for two reasons:

1. Simulation of the production system behavior is achieved with as similar setup as possible, and fencing takes an important part in the cluster and its logic.

2. A replicated production environment contain data which might have some importance, and if not that, at least re-replicating it from the production environment after a case of uncontrolled access to the disk by a faulty node (and this test cluster is in a higher risk, as defined by its role), or restoring from tapes is unpleasant and time consuming.

So we agree that the test cluster should have some sort of fencing device, even if not similar to production’s one, for the sake of the cluster logic.

On some sites, there is a demand for more than one test environment. Both setups – a single test environment and multiple test environments can be defined to work as guests on a virtual server. Virtualization assists in saving hardware (and power, and cooling) costs, and allows for easy duplication and replication, so this is a case where it is ideal for the task. This said, it brings up a problem – fencing a virtual server has implications – we can kill all guest systems in one go. We wouldn’t want that to happen. Lucky for us, RedHat Cluster has a fencing device for VMware, which, although not recommended in a production environment, will suffice for a test environment. These are the steps required to setup one such VMware fencing device in RHCS5:

1. Download the latest CVS fence_vmware from here. You can use this direct link (use with “save target as”). Save it in your /sbin directory under the name fence_vmware, and give it execution permissions.

2. Edit fence_vmware. In line 249 change the string “port” to “vmname”.

3. Install VMware Perl API on both cluster nodes. You will need to have gcc and openssl-devel installed on your system to be able to do so.

4. Change your fencing based on this example:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<cluster alias="Gfs-test" config_version="39" name="Gfs-test">
        <fence_daemon clean_start="0" post_fail_delay="0" post_join_delay="3"/>
                <clusternode name="cent2" nodeid="1" votes="1">
                                <method name="1">
                                        <device name="man2"/>
                <clusternode name="cent1" nodeid="2" votes="1">
                                <method name="1">
                                        <device name="man1"/>
                                <method name="2">
                                        <device domain="22 " name="11 "/>
        <cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1"/>
                <fencedevice agent="fence_vmware" name="man2"
                          ipaddr="" login="user" passwd="password"
                <fencedevice agent="fence_vmware" name="man1"
                          ipaddr="" login="user" passwd="password"
                        <fs device="/dev/sda" force_fsck="0" force_unmount="0"
				fsid="5" fstype="ext3" mountpoint="/data"
                                name="sda" options="" self_fence="0"/>
                <service autostart="1" name="smartd">
                        <ip address="" monitor_link="1"/>
                <service autostart="1" name="disk1">
                        <fs ref="sda"/>

Change to your relevant VMware username and password.

If you have a Centos system, you will be required to perform these three steps:

1. ‘ln -s /usr/sbin/cman_tool /sbin/cman_tool

2. ‘cp /etc/redhat-release /etc/redhat-release.orig

3. ‘echo “Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga)” > /etc/redhat-release

This should do the trick. Good luck, and thanks again to Yoni who brought and fought the configuration steps.


Per comments (and a bit-late – common logic) I have broken lines in the XML quote for cluster.conf. In cases these line breaks might break something in RedHat Cluster, I have added the original xml file here: cluster.conf

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

22 Responses to “VMware Fencing in RedHat Cluster 5 (RHCS5)”

  1. Yonatan Says:


    works on redhat 4 clustered with gfs 🙂

  2. Ez-Aton Says:

    What works? VMware fencing? As described?

  3. Yonatan Says:

    Yup Vmware fencing works with a simple code modification

    adding these 4 lines after line 264:

    > #use strict;
    < elsif ($name eq "nodename" )
    < {
    < $opt_ZZv = $val;
    < }

  4. Running Systems Says:

    During an attempt to use the VMware Perl SDK, I have encountered the following error:VMControl Panic: SSLLoadSharedLibrary: Failed to load library /usr/bin/libcrypto.so.0.9.7:/usr/bin/libcrypto.so.0.9.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or dir

  5. Running Systems Says:

    I have been struggling with RH Cluster 4 with VMware fencing device. This was also a good experiance with qdiskd, the Disk Quorum directive and utilization. I have several conclusions out of this experience. First, the configuration, as is:<?xml versio

  6. Falko Says:


    it should be said, that this only works for ESX 2.x because VI 3 uses another [url=http://www.vmware.com/download/download.do?downloadGroup=VI-PT-1-5]API[/url]

    Has someone seen, a fencing agent which uses the new VI3 API?



  7. Ez-Aton Says:

    Hi Falko.

    I have never tested it on ESX. I use (almost) VMware-Server almost solemnly, so there was not a chance.

    You can hack it to actually run a script which does ssh to the ESX server (although for VI you might want to query on which physical server it is) and power off the server. Still, maintaining the same command-line switches and parameters, and you should be good to go on RHCS.


  8. janont Says:

    I’m using VI Perl Toolkit + some part of script from fence_vmware to fence virtual m/c by RHCS. A script will connect to VI server and reset or poweroff v/m if need.

  9. Ez Aton Says:

    Can you attach your script here? I would love to have it online (for the next time I get to use VI)


  10. Fencing Red Hat Cluster & VMWare server « Slimejuggernaut Says:

    […] of information: VMware Communities VMware Fencing in Red Hat Cluster 5 Red Hat Cluster FAQ Red Hat Fencing […]

  11. OpenOffice Download Says:

    OpenOffice Download…

    […Kindly Accept This Exchanging Invitation…]…

  12. Redhat Cluster in Virtual Environment Says:

    […] […]

  13. Yobi Says:

    Hello ez.

    One small question :

    Why the vmname is configured as a “Windows” style path (C: bla bla) ?


  14. ez-aton Says:

    This is because this particular system was on Vmware Workstation on Windows, and thus, the locations of the vmx files were ‘windows’…
    This custom agent is no longer needed with VMWare ESXi4 and above, as the new agent makes use of the http(s) and API access methods, and thus – probably more resilient to changes (no one is thrilled to perform API changes just like that).


  15. Massimiliano Adamo Says:

    Oracle RAC that you have cited (or IBM GPFS), don’t need a fence device, as it’s a clustered filesystem
    On a clustered filesystem all nodes can acces the data at the same time…. therefore is no nedd to kick out a node from the cluster.

  16. ez-aton Says:

    You are mistaken, of course. All clustered filesystems enforce an internal fencing mechanism. Oracle OCFS2 reacts badly to communication failures, bu freezing all IO for a defined period of time (can you imaging 60 seconds IO freeze on a running DB? And what happens if it’s on the voting disk?) until a node ejects out of the cluster. The eject process usually involves self-fence of the node – aka – a reboot. Very common for self-fence. By the way, lack of access to the voting disk for a too long period of time can result, just the same, with a node forced reboot.

    Oracle ACFS makes use of the ASM locking mechanism. This locking mechanism is making use of the Oracle Cluster voting disk, and again – with split, some of the nodes might reset.

    Veritas Clusters, when using shared filesystem such as the shared option ov VxFS, use DG-based locking and reservation as a mechanism of fencing. A node can block the disk access of another node(s) using DG lock or SCSI reservation, and this, in turn, triggers the internal cluster logic regarding access to the witness disks.

    Nodes do get kicked out of a cluster. All and every cluster, as far as I know. However, while the underline methods might differ, the basic logic remains quite the same. RHCS does hardware fencing. Oracle RAC today performs self-fencing, but (and this is important!) later versions ( and above, if I’m not mistaken) allow you to define IPMI port for the cluster nodes. Why would the cluster require the addresses of the IPMI ports, you might wonder? The answer is that the cluster might use them to complete a fencing operation.


  17. Vitaliy Says:


    Erorrs during installiation:

    Running Mkbootstrap for VMware::VmPerl ()
    vmcontrol.o: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
    collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

    I have rhel 6.3 x64_86, maybe through х64 architectory?

  18. ez-aton Says:

    Check out this:


  19. Md. Mudassir Mustafa Says:

    Hi ,

    I was configuring RHEL5 clustering on vmware workstation ( for testing). and following your steps for fencing device configuration. But when i was trying to install the ‘VMware Perl API’ the installer was giving me the error::
    “Unable to compile the VMware VmPerl Scripting API.

    The VMware VmPerl Scripting API was not installed. Errors encountered during
    compilation and installation of the module can be found here: /tmp/api-config3

    You will not be able to use the “vmware-cmd” program.”

    My setup is like that::

    host machine:: Oracle Linux 5.
    Then VMWare Workstation 7.1
    On VM Workstation i have two rhel5.6 nodes on which i was trying to create a cluster.

    Can you suggest ,

  20. ez-aton Says:

    Did you check here:


  21. arka Says:

    will it run for vmware workstation?

  22. ez-aton Says:

    I never tested it, but I think it will.


Leave a Reply